Aorist i imperfekat
Overview
Serbian has four past tenses. Perfekat (covered in the A2 lesson on the past tense) is the one you use every day, and the pluperfect, плусквамперфекат, has a B2 lesson of its own. This lesson covers the other two, the only one-word (synthetic) past tenses - aorist and imperfect - which today live mostly in literature, folk narration and a handful of set colloquial phrases, with the odd appearance in a dramatic headline. The goal is recognition first: know the tense when you meet it in a folk tale, a headline or a line of literary prose - not to replace perfekat in your own everyday speech. The few exercises that ask you to build or correct a form are limited form practice: you work with a few frequent forms so that you can recognise them.
The two tenses split along the aspect line the verb aspect pairs lesson taught: aorist reports one completed action and is built mostly from perfective verbs; imperfect describes an ongoing or habitual past action, built mostly from imperfective verbs. Neither takes the auxiliary бити at all - unlike perfekat, both are formed as a single word.
Aorist - formation and survival in speech
Aorist has two formation patterns depending on the infinitive stem. Verbs whose stem ends in a vowel (видети → виде-) add -х in the 1st singular, no ending in the 2nd/3rd singular (bare stem), and -смо/-сте/-ше in the plural: видех, виде, виде, видесмо, видесте, видеше. Verbs whose stem ends in a consonant (рећи → рек-) add -ох/-е/-е/-осмо/-осте/-оше instead, with the final consonant often softening before the front vowel е: рекох, рече, рече, рекосмо, рекосте, рекоше - note рече, not a hypothetical *реке.
The aorist is far from dead in speech. Рекох means 'I thought, I figured' (Рекох да свратим - I figured I'd drop by) or 'as I said', and short exclamations like Стигох! (Here I am!) or Умало не падох! (I nearly fell!) give a story immediacy. Literary narrative prose still reaches for the aorist for narrative punch; news reports and official texts avoid it in favor of perfekat, apart from the occasional headline that wants drama. Its most important living fossil hides in plain sight: the conditional auxiliary from the conditionals lesson - бих, би, би, бисмо, бисте, би - is historically the aorist of бити itself. As a true aorist, бити still has its own 3rd person plural бише (Неки детаљи бише заборављени - some details were forgotten), where the conditional has би.
Imperfect - formation and where it survives
Imperfect formation depends on the infinitive stem and its final sound. With stems ending in -a, add -ах/-аше/-аше/-асмо/-асте/-аху: имати - имах, имаше... With stems ending in -е, -и or -у, the final vowel drops and -јах/-јаше... is added, often with jotation: видети - виђах, носити - ношах. Consonant-final stems commonly take -ијах/-ијаше...: трести - тресијах, пећи - пецијах (also печах). The table shows common patterns; these forms are rare, and individual verbs may have variants. This differs from the aorist, which is built on the infinitive stem with its own endings.
Outside poetry, folk epic and literary narration, the imperfect has essentially disappeared from the standard language. The one form worth memorizing on sight is беше (бити, 3rd singular). It opens countless Serbian folk tales - Беше једном... (Once upon a time there was...) - though just as many begin with perfekat without its auxiliary: Био једном један цар... It also lives on in speech when you are trying to recall something - Како се оно беше звао? (What was his name again?) - and in literary description of an ongoing past state.
Recognizing aorist and imperfect in a text
Neither tense carries an auxiliary, so a stand-alone stressed verb with no сам/си/је... nearby is already a strong clue you're looking at one of the two, not perfekat. The endings then narrow it down. -ху is always the imperfect 3rd person plural (имаху, виђаху). -ше is two different forms - the aorist 3rd plural (рекоше, видеше) and the imperfect 2nd/3rd singular (имаше, беше) - so let the subject decide: они рекоше is aorist, он имаше imperfect. In the 1st singular, look at the vowel before -х: -ех, -их and -ох (видех, радих, рекох) are aorist - the common exception is бех, a short imperfect of бити - while -ах can be either tense: имах is the imperfect of имати and also its aorist. Verbs in -ати share even more between the two tenses - the 1st and 2nd plural too (имасмо, имасте).
Two more traps. The aorist 2nd/3rd singular often looks exactly like a present-tense form: оде, дође and умре are also present forms of отићи, доћи and умрети (кад дође - when he comes), and виде is also the present 'they see' - only a narrated past makes them aorists. And aspect is a tendency, not a test: most aorists come from perfective verbs, but imperfective verbs form the aorist too, as радих does in this lesson's examples.
So treat both tenses first as something to recognize, and keep perfekat as your default when you write and speak. Using a few frequent forms yourself is natural - рекох, рече, a storyteller's беше једном - and building them in exercises is good practice for recognizing them, but nothing at B2 expects you to tell a whole story in the aorist.
Tables
| Person | Form |
|---|---|
| 1. | videh |
| 2. | vide |
| 3. | vide |
| 1st pl. | videsmo |
| 2nd pl. | videste |
| 3rd pl. | videše |
Examples
Compared with…
English's simple past (I saw, he said) is aspectually closer to aorist's punctual, completed sense, and English's habitual used to do or continuous was doing echoes imperfect's ongoing/habitual sense - useful conceptual anchors, nothing more. English flattened its own older tense-aspect distinctions into one simple past long ago, so - like Russian, for a different historical reason - it gives no ready-made morphology to transfer, only a rough meaning-level parallel.
Common mistakes
Tips & exceptions
- -ху never misleads: it is always the imperfect 3rd person plural (имаху, виђаху). -ше is both the aorist 3rd plural (рекоше, видеше) and the imperfect 2nd/3rd singular (имаше, беше), so check the subject: plural means aorist, singular imperfect.
- In the 1st singular, the vowel before -х does the work: -ех, -их, -ох (видех, радих, рекох) mark the aorist - бех, a short imperfect of бити, is the common exception - while -ах (имах, чеках) can be either tense, and only context decides. Aspect is a tendency, not a test: imperfective verbs form the aorist too (радих).
- Recognition comes first, and perfekat stays your default - but a few frequent forms are worth using yourself: рекох and рече in conversation, беше једном when you tell a story.
- Бити's full imperfect paradigm (бејах, бејаше..., or the short бех, беше...) is attested but genuinely rare even in literature; only the fixed 3rd-singular беше is worth memorizing on sight.
- A handful of aorist forms have drifted into set colloquial phrases detached from their original narrative context - рекох meaning 'I thought, I figured' (Рекох да свратим) or 'as I said', not a report of one specific past utterance.
- Many -ирати/-овати verbs and other recent borrowings rarely form an aorist or imperfect at all in practice - encountering one there would be unusual enough that this lesson does not expect you to recognize it.
Summary
Grammar Words Guided lesson Guided lesson Guided lesson Guided lesson Guided lesson Guided lesson Listening Reading Writing Speaking Test
This lesson is the unit's first step. The grammar, the words and the first guided lesson are open to everyone; the rest of the unit's lessons and its text, dialogue and tasks come with Premium.