Log in

Genitiv uz odrične glagole

genitive-of-negation

Overview

The A1 lesson on the verb имати already showed нема as a fixed phrase - „Нема проблема.“ - and promised that the missing thing's case would be covered fully in a later lesson. This is that lesson: the genitive from the A2 genitive lesson is exactly the case negation reaches for, and проблема is simply its genitive (singular and plural look alike here), not an unrelated fixed ending.

The pattern is traditionally called генитив уз одричне глаголе (the genitive with negated verbs). In Serbian it survives most robustly in exactly two places: the impersonal нема and the personal немати - both already familiar, both now getting their missing rule.

Нема + genitive - negating existence

Нема never conjugates for person, even when the missing thing is ours or theirs - it stays a frozen, impersonal 3rd-person-singular form, and whatever is missing shifts from what would be nominative into genitive: „Нема хлеба.“ (хлеб → хлеба) „Нема места.“ (место → места)

This also covers the negative pronouns from the A1 negation lesson: „Нема никога код куће.“ (There's nobody home) puts нико into its genitive form никога, exactly like any other missing thing.

Немати + genitive - negating possession

The personal, conjugated немати (from the A1 lesson on имати: немам, немаш, нема…) works the same way on its direct object: whatever would be the accusative object of affirmative имати becomes genitive once negated. „Имам новац.“ (accusative, unchanged for this noun) becomes „Немам новца.“ (genitive). The genitive stays in every tense: „Нисам имао новца.“ „Нећу имати времена.“

With немати, both genitive and accusative occur in contemporary Serbian. Genitive is frequent, especially for quantities and indefinite objects: Немам новца (I have no money), Немам времена (I have no time). Accusative is also natural with a definite object: Немам ту књигу (I do not have that book). Both forms occur in standard usage; the accusative is not limited to colloquial speech.

Negated existence across every tense

Нема is really just the present tense of a wider pattern: negated existence keeps the genitive whatever the tense, built on the forms of negated бити (from the A2 lessons on the perfekat and the futur). The past uses the neuter participle било impersonally: „Није било хлеба.“ (There wasn't any bread.) The future uses неће бити: „Неће бити места.“ (There won't be room.)

Genitive after без (without) is a different, unrelated rule - без takes the genitive whether the clause is negative or not (без хлеба needs no negated verb at all) - so don't read every genitive near a negated sentence as this construction.

Tables

„Imati“/„nemati“ + complement
NounAccusative (affirmative)Genitive (negative)
novac novac novca
vreme vreme vremena
posao posao posla
sestra sestru sestre

Examples

Nemam novca.
I have no money.
немати negated: the object switches from accusative to genitive.
Ona nema vremena danas.
She has no time today.
Same genitive shift, 3rd person - compare Немам времена from the A2 lesson on verb aspect.
Nema problema, mogu sutra.
No problem, I can do it tomorrow.
The genitive проблема behind the fixed phrase Нема проблема from the A1 lesson on имати.
Nema hleba u kući.
There's no bread in the house.
Impersonal нема - the missing thing is always genitive.
Nema nikoga kod kuće.
There's nobody home.
Нико from the A1 negation lesson, in its genitive form никога.
Nije bilo novca za putovanje.
There wasn't any money for the trip.
Negated existence keeps the genitive in the past too - било + genitive.
Neće biti mesta na koncertu.
There won't be room at the concert.
…and in the future: неће бити + genitive.
Imam novac, ali nemam vremena za putovanje.
I have money, but no time to travel.
Accusative новац (affirmative) next to genitive времена (negated) in one sentence.
Nemam ni novca ni vremena.
I have neither money nor time.
Both objects of немати joined by ни…ни take the genitive, not just the first.
Prošlog meseca nisam imao novca za ratu.
Last month I didn't have money for the installment.
Negated possession in the past: нисам имао + genitive - the genitive stays in every tense, just as it does after није било.
Sutra neću imati vremena.
Tomorrow I won't have time.
…and in the future: нећу имати + genitive.
Na računu nema dovoljno novca.
There isn't enough money in the account.
Nema negates existence and takes the genitive, and dovoljno (enough) wants the genitive too: novca.

Compared with…

English marks none of this: have simply takes no or not any before the object, with zero case marking - I have no money and I have money use the identical noun form. A learner used to English has to actively remember that negating the verb also changes the noun's ending, not just add not.

Serbian
Nema hleba.
English bread never changes; Serbian хлеб → хлеба does.
English
There's no bread.

Common mistakes

Wrong
Nije bila vode.
Right
Nije bilo vode.
Negated existence in the past is impersonal: the participle stays neuter, било, whatever the gender of the missing thing, because the genitive воде is not a subject the verb could agree with.
Wrong
Nema hleb u kući.
Right
Nema hleba u kući.
The impersonal existential нема always takes the genitive; хлеб is the unmarked nominative/accusative form and cannot follow нема.
Wrong
Nije bilo hleb juče.
Right
Nije bilo hleba juče.
Negated existence keeps the genitive across every tense, not just the present-tense нема - the perfekat било needs it too.
Wrong
Nemam ni novca ni vreme.
Right
Nemam ni novca ni vremena.
In the neutral standard the genitive goes on every coordinated object of немати, not just the first - новца already is, so време → времена too; a genitive beside an accusative mixes two patterns.

Tips & exceptions

Tips
  • Test with нема first: if the impersonal it doesn't exist reading works, the following noun is always genitive - no exceptions.
  • Learn немати/нема as a matched pair with имати: in the neutral standard, whatever would be the accusative object of имати becomes genitive the moment you negate to немати/нема.
  • With немати, genitive is common with quantities and indefinite objects; accusative is natural with a definite object. Both forms occur in standard Serbian.
Exceptions
  • Genitive after без is unrelated to negation - без always takes the genitive whether the clause is affirmative or negative, so don't read every genitive near a negated verb as this construction.
  • Negated verbs other than немати/нема and negated бити mostly keep the accusative in modern Serbian („Не читам ту књигу.“, not the genitive); the productive genitive-of-negation rule is essentially limited to existence and possession, not every transitive verb.
  • Нема itself never conjugates for person - it stays a frozen impersonal 3rd-singular form even when the ones missing are we or they, who go into the genitive: „Нема нас код куће.“ (We aren't home.) „Нема их.“ (They aren't here.) A personal form like немамо would mean we don't have instead.

Summary

Нема + genitive expresses absence. With немати, both genitive and accusative occur: genitive is frequent with quantities and indefinite objects (Немам новца, Немам времена), while accusative is natural with a definite object (Немам ту књигу). Both are used in standard Serbian. Negated existence keeps the genitive in all tenses. The genitive after без is a separate rule, unrelated to negation.
Ready to practice?
12 exercises for this lesson

Opens Focus mode: one exercise at a time, with explanations - either script accepted.

Go to exercises
Part of a unit
B1 13 steps
Bank & money: what's missing from the account
  1. Grammar
  2. Words
  3. Guided lesson
  4. Guided lesson
  5. Guided lesson
  6. Guided lesson
  7. Guided lesson
  8. Guided lesson
  9. Listening
  10. Reading
  11. Writing
  12. Speaking
  13. Test

This lesson is the unit's first step. The grammar, the words and the first guided lesson are open to everyone; the rest of the unit's lessons and its text, dialogue and tasks come with Premium.

GrammarUnitsSearchCardsProfile
A word about cookies

We use Google's advertising tag and Yandex Metrika to see whether an ad brought you here and led to a sign-up or a subscription. They set their cookies only if you allow it. Nothing else on this site tracks you. Privacy policy