Step 1 of 13

Genitiv uz odrične glagole

genitive-of-negation

Overview

verb-imati-present-a1 already showed нема as a fixed phrase - „Нема проблема.“ - and promised that the missing thing's case would be covered fully in a later lesson. This is that lesson: genitive-case-a2's genitive is exactly the case negation reaches for, and проблема is its genitive singular, not an unrelated fixed ending.

The pattern is traditionally called генитив уз одричне глаголе (the genitive with negated verbs). In Serbian it survives most robustly in exactly two places: the impersonal нема and the personal немати - both already familiar, both now getting their missing rule.

Нема + genitive - negating existence

Нема never conjugates for person, even when the missing thing is ours or theirs - it stays a frozen, impersonal 3rd-person-singular form, and whatever is missing shifts from what would be nominative into genitive: „Нема хлеба.“ (хлеб → хлеба) „Нема места.“ (место → места)

This also folds in negation-a1's negative pronouns: „Нема никога код куће.“ (There's nobody home) puts нико into its genitive form никога, exactly like any other missing thing.

Немати + genitive - negating possession

The personal, conjugated немати (verb-imati-present-a1: немам, немаш, нема…) works the same way on its direct object: whatever would be the accusative object of affirmative имати becomes genitive once negated. „Имам новац.“ (accusative, unchanged for this noun) becomes „Немам новца.“ (genitive).

Modern colloquial speech sometimes keeps the accusative after немати, especially with a specific, definite object - you'll hear Немам ту књигу alongside the more traditional Немам те књиге. The genitive stays the standard, written-register choice, and the one to produce actively.

Negated existence across every tense

Нема is really just the present tense of a wider pattern: negated existence keeps the genitive whatever the tense, built on negated бити's own forms (past-tense-perfekat-a2, future-tense-futur-a2). The past uses the neuter participle било impersonally: „Није било хлеба.“ (There wasn't any bread.) The future uses неће бити: „Неће бити места.“ (There won't be room.)

Genitive after без (without) is a different, unrelated rule - без takes the genitive whether the clause is negative or not (без хлеба needs no negated verb at all) - so don't read every genitive near a negated sentence as this construction.

Tables

„Imati“/„nemati“ + complement
NounAccusative (affirmative)Genitive (negative)
novac novac novca
vreme vreme vremena
posao posao posla
sestra sestru sestre

Examples

Nemam novca.
I have no money.
немати negated: the object switches from accusative to genitive.
Ona nema vremena danas.
She has no time today.
Same genitive shift, 3rd person - compare verb-aspect-intro-a2's own Немам времена.
Nema problema, mogu sutra.
No problem, I can do it tomorrow.
The genitive проблема behind verb-imati-present-a1's fixed phrase Нема проблема.
Nema hleba u kući.
There's no bread in the house.
Impersonal нема - the missing thing is always genitive.
Nema nikoga kod kuće.
There's nobody home.
negation-a1's нико in its own genitive form, никога.
Nije bilo novca za putovanje.
There wasn't any money for the trip.
Negated existence keeps the genitive in the past too - било + genitive.
Neće biti mesta na koncertu.
There won't be room at the concert.
…and in the future: неће бити + genitive.
Imam novac, ali nemam vremena za putovanje.
I have money, but no time to travel.
Accusative новац (affirmative) next to genitive времена (negated) in one sentence.
Nemam ni novca ni vremena.
I have neither money nor time.
Both coordinated objects of a negated verb take the genitive - reuses negation-a1's ни…ни.

Compared with…

English marks none of this: have simply takes no or not any before the object, with zero case marking - I have no money and I have money use the identical noun form. A learner used to English has to actively remember that negating the verb also changes the noun's ending, not just add not.

Serbian
Nema hleba.
English bread never changes; Serbian хлебхлеба does.
English
There's no bread.

Common mistakes

Wrong
Nemam novac.
Right
Nemam novca.
Negated имати (немати) governs the genitive, not the accusative - новац (unchanged accusative for this noun) must shift to новца (genitive) once negated.
Wrong
Nema hleb u kući.
Right
Nema hleba u kući.
The impersonal existential нема always takes the genitive; хлеб is the unmarked nominative/accusative form and cannot follow нема.
Wrong
Nije bilo hleb juče.
Right
Nije bilo hleba juče.
Negated existence keeps the genitive across every tense, not just the present-tense нема - the perfekat било needs it too.
Wrong
Nemam ni novac ni vreme.
Right
Nemam ni novca ni vremena.
Both coordinated objects of a negated verb take the genitive, not just the first - новацновца and времевремена.

Tips & exceptions

Tips
  • Test with нема first: if the impersonal it doesn't exist reading works, the following noun is always genitive - no exceptions.
  • Learn немати/нема as a matched pair with имати: whatever would be the accusative object of имати becomes genitive the moment you negate to немати/нема.
  • Modern colloquial speech sometimes keeps the accusative after немати, especially with a definite object - genitive stays the standard, written-register default and the form to produce actively.
Exceptions
  • Genitive after без is unrelated to negation - без always takes the genitive whether the clause is affirmative or negative, so don't read every genitive near a negated verb as this construction.
  • Negated verbs other than (не)мати/(не)бити mostly keep the accusative in modern Serbian (Не читам ту књигу, not the genitive); the productive genitive-of-negation rule is essentially limited to existence and possession, not every transitive verb.
  • Нема itself never conjugates for person - it stays a frozen impersonal 3rd-singular form even for we/they: „Нема (никог) код нас.“, not a made-up personal form for this existential sense.

Summary

Negating имати/бити shifts what would be the accusative (or bare subject, for existence) into the genitive: нема + genitive says something doesn't exist or isn't available (Нема хлеба, Нема проблема), and немати + genitive says someone doesn't have it (Немам новца, Немам времена) - the same shift as affirmative Имам новац → negated Немам новца. The pattern survives across every tense, built on негирано бити (Није било хлеба, Неће бити места), and stays genitive-marked whether the sentence is present, past or future. It does not extend to negated verbs generally, and genitive after без is a separate, unrelated rule.
Ready to practice?
12 exercises for this lesson

Opens Focus mode: one exercise at a time, with explanations — either script accepted.

Go to exercises
Part of a unit
B1 13 steps
Bank & money: what's missing from the account
  1. Grammar
  2. Words
  3. Guided lesson
  4. Guided lesson
  5. Guided lesson
  6. Guided lesson
  7. Guided lesson
  8. Guided lesson
  9. Listening
  10. Reading
  11. Writing
  12. Speaking
  13. Test

This lesson is the unit's first step. The grammar, the words and the first guided lesson are open to everyone; the rest of the unit's lessons and its text, dialogue and tasks come with Premium.

A word about cookies

We use Google's advertising tag and Yandex Metrika to see whether an ad brought you here and led to a sign-up or a subscription. They set their cookies only if you allow it. Nothing else on this site tracks you. Privacy policy